Document Type : Original Research Paper

Authors

1 Independent Researcher, Suez, Egypt.

2 IT department, Industrial & Systems Engineering, Tarbiat Modares university, Tehran, Iran.

3 Department of Computer and Information Technology Engineering, Payame Noor University (PNU), Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Identifying and classifying cancer-driving genes by analyzing their complex relationships within gene regulatory networks (GRN) can significantly aid in the development, progression, and discovery of targeted cancer therapies. The cancer-driving genes are responsible for tumorigenesis and disease progression. However, the current methods frequently concentrate on network rebuilding, which restricts their capacity to identify regulatory linkages. By utilizing the structural and functional characteristics of GRNs, this work seeks to create a strong graph-based framework for precise cancer driver gene classification.
Methods: Network and graph-based methodologies are employed to analyze these complex gene networks. Using graph neural networks (GNN), complex intergenic patterns can be identified in genetic and cellular data. In this study, a GNN-based framework is proposed to classify genes in gene regulatory networks in order to improve the detection of cancer-driving genes. The proposed graph-based framework effectively integrates multi-omics data and mitigates class imbalance through an artificial oversampling strategy. The proposed GNN-based framework facilitates the modeling of both topological structure and feature information within gene interaction networks. Additionally, it addresses the challenges of class imbalance between driver and non-driver genes through the implementation of the GraphSMOTE technique.
Results: To construct the gene regulatory graph, the Regetworks regulatory dataset was combined with three gene expression datasets related to breast, lung, and colon cancers. The results demonstrate that the proposed model consistently attains robust classification performance, with AUC-ROC scores exceeding 0.77 in all cases and F1 scores above 0.70, outperforming previous network-based methods.
Conclusion: The evaluation criteria show that the proposed model has a high ability to generalize tumor types with differences in network topology and class imbalance.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Open Access

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

 

Publisher’s Note

JECEI Publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

 

Publisher

Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University


LETTERS TO EDITOR

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering Innovations (JECEI) welcomes letters to the editor for the post-publication discussions and corrections which allows debate post publication on its site, through the Letters to Editor. Letters pertaining to manuscript published in JECEI should be sent to the editorial office of JECEI within three months of either online publication or before printed publication, except for critiques of original research. Following points are to be considering before sending the letters (comments) to the editor.


[1] Letters that include statements of statistics, facts, research, or theories should include appropriate references, although more than three are discouraged.

[2] Letters that are personal attacks on an author rather than thoughtful criticism of the author’s ideas will not be considered for publication.

[3] Letters can be no more than 300 words in length.

[4] Letter writers should include a statement at the beginning of the letter stating that it is being submitted either for publication or not.

[5] Anonymous letters will not be considered.

[6] Letter writers must include their city and state of residence or work.

[7] Letters will be edited for clarity and length.

CAPTCHA Image