Depuration‎ based Efficient Coverage Mechanism for ‎Wireless Sensor Network

Ashraf, S.; Ahmed, T.; Aslam, Z.; Muhammad, D.; Yahya, A.; Shuaeeb, M.

doi:10.22061/jecei.2020.6874.344

Document Type : Original Research Paper

Authors

¹ College of Internet of Things Engineering, Hohai University Changzhou, Jiangsu, China

² Petroweld Kurdistan, Erbil, Iraq

³ Pakistan Steel Mills, Karachi, Pakistan

⁴ Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan

https://doi.org/10.22061/jecei.2020.6874.344

Abstract

Background and Objectives: The quick response time and the coverage range are the crucial ‎factors by which the quality service of a wireless sensor network ‎can be acknowledged. In some cases, even networks possess ‎sufficient available bandwidth but due to coverage tribulations, the ‎customer satisfaction gets down suddenly. The increasing number of ‎nodes directly is neither a canny solution to overcome the coverage ‎problem nor a cost-effective. In fact, by changing the positions of the ‎deployed node sagaciously can resolve the coverage issue and seems ‎a cost-effective solution. Therefore, keeping all circumstances, a ‎Depuration based Efficient Coverage Mechanism (DECM) has been ‎developed. This algorithm suggests the new shifting positions for ‎previously deployed sensor nodes to fill the coverage gap.
Methods: It is a redeployment process and accomplished in two rounds. The ‎first round avails the Dissimilitude Enhancement Scheme (DES)‎, ‎which searches the node to be shifted at new positions. The second ‎round controls the unnecessary movement of the sensor nodes by ‎the Depuration mechanism thereby the distance between previous ‎and new positions is reduced. ‎
Results: The factors like loudness, pulse emission rate, maximum ‎frequency, and sensing radius are meticulously explored during ‎simulation rounds conducted by MATLAB. The performance of ‎DECM has been compared with superlative algorithms i.e., Fruit Fly ‎Optimization Algorithm (FOA)‎, Particle Swarm Optimization ‎‎(PSO)‎, ‎and Ant Colony Optimization ‎‎(ACO)‎ in terms of mean coverage ‎range, computation time, standard deviation, and network energy ‎diminution.‎
Conclusion: According to the simulation results, the DECM has achieved more ‎than 98% coverage range, with a trivial computation time of nearly ‎‎0.016 seconds as compared to FOA, PSO, and ACO. ‎

Keywords

20.1001.1.23223952.2020.8.2.1.2

Main Subjects

Wireless Sensor Network

Open Access

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Publisher’s Note

JECEI Publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Publisher

Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University

References

[1] M. Abazeed, N. Faisal, S. Zubair, A. Ali, ‎‎“Routing Protocols for Wireless Multimedia Sensor Network: ‎A Survey,” 2013: 1-12, 2013.

[2] S. Ashraf, T. Ahmed, “Machine Learning Shrewd Approach ‎For An Imbalanced Dataset Conversion Samples,” J. Eng. ‎Technol. JET, 11(1): 1-9, 2020.

[3] M. S. Aliyu, A. H. Abdullah, H. Chizari, T. Sabbah, A. ‎Altameem, “Coverage Enhancement Algorithms for ‎Distributed Mobile Sensors Deployment in Wireless Sensor ‎Networks,” Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Netw., 12(3): ‎‎9169236, 2016.

[4] S. Ashraf, Z. A. Arfeen, M. A. Khan, T. Ahmed, “SLM-OJ: ‎Surrogate Learning Mechanism during Outbreak Juncture,” ‎Int. J. Mod. Trends Sci. Technol., 6(5): 162–167, ‎‎2020.

[5] F. Ait Aoudia, M. Gautier, M. Magno, O. Berder, L. Benini, ‎‎“A Generic Framework for Modeling MAC Protocols in ‎Wireless Sensor Networks,” IEEEACM Trans. Netw., 25(3): 1489–1500, 2017.

[6] S. Ashraf, A. Ahmad, A. Yahya, T. Ahmed, “Underwater ‎routing protocols: Analysis of link selection challenges,” ‎AIMS Electron. Electr. Eng., 4(3): 234–248, 2020.

[7] S. Ashraf, D. Muhammad, Z. Aslam, “Analyzing challenging ‎aspects of IPv6 over IPv4,” J. Ilm. Tek. Elektro Komput. Dan ‎Inform., 6(1): 54–67, 2020.

[8] S. Ashraf, Z. Aslam, S. Saleem, S. Afnan, M. Aamer, “Multi-‎biometric Sustainable Approach for Human Appellative,” ‎CRPASE Trans. Electr. Electron. Comput. Eng., 6(3): 146–152, 2020.‎

[9] S. Goyal, M. S. Patterh, “Flower pollination algorithm ‎based localization of wireless sensor network,” in Proc. 2015 2nd ‎International Conference on Recent Advances in Engineering ‎Computational Sciences (RAECS): 1–5, 2015.

[10] S. Ashraf, Z. Aslam, A. Yahya, A. Tahir, “Underwater ‎Routing Protocols Analysis of Intrepid Link Selection ‎Mechanism, Challenges and Strategies,” Int. J. Sci. Res. Comput. ‎Sci. Eng., 8(2): 1–9, 2020.

[11] S. Ashraf, M. Gao, Z. Mingchen, T. Ahmed, A. Raza, H. ‎Naeem, “USPF: Underwater Shrewd Packet Flooding ‎Mechanism through Surrogate Holding Time,” Wirel. ‎Commun. Mob. Comput., 2020: 1–12, 2020.

[12] S. Ashraf, A. Raza, Z. Aslam, H. Naeem, T. Ahmed, ‎‎“Underwater Resurrection Routing Synergy using Astucious ‎Energy Pods,” J. Robot. Control JRC, 1(5): 173-184, 2020.

[13] S. Ashraf, S. Saleem, A. H. Chohan, Z. Aslam, A. Raza, ‎‎“Challenging strategic trends in green supply chain ‎‎management,” Int. J. Res. Eng. Appl. Sci. JREAS, 5(2): ‎‎71–74, 2020.

[14] S. Ashraf, T. Ahmed, S. Saleem, Z. Aslam, “Diverging ‎Mysterious in Green Supply Chain Management,” Orient. J. ‎Comput. Sci. Technol., 13(1): 22–28, 2020.‎

[15] S. Ashraf, T. Ahmed, A. Raza, H. Naeem, “Design of Shrewd ‎Underwater Routing Synergy Using Porous Energy Shells,” ‎Smart Cities, 3(1): 74–92, 2020.

[16] S. Ashraf, T. Ahmed, “Dual-nature biometric recognition ‎epitome,” Trends Comput. Sci. Inf. Technol., 5(1): ‎‎008–014, 2020.

[17] Q. Zhang, M. Fok, “A Two-Phase Coverage-Enhancing ‎Algorithm for Hybrid Wireless Sensor Networks,” Sensors, ‎17(12): 117, 2017.

[18] J. Li, B. Zhang, L. Cui, S. Chai, “An Extended Virtual Force-‎Based Approach to Distributed Self-Deployment in Mobile ‎Sensor Networks,” Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Netw., 8(3): 417307, 2012.‎

[19] G. Wang, G. Cao, T. F. La Porta, “Movement-assisted ‎sensor deployment,” IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput., 5(6): 640–652, 2006.

[20] H. Mahboubi, A. G. Aghdam, “Distributed Deployment ‎Algorithms for Coverage Improvement in a Network of ‎Wireless Mobile Sensors: Relocation by Virtual Force,” IEEE ‎Trans. Control Netw. Syst., 4(4): 736–748, 2017.

[21] W.-T. Pan, “A new Fruit Fly Optimization Algorithm: Taking ‎the financial distress model as an example,” Knowl.-Based ‎Syst., 26: 69–74, 2012.

[22] M. Marinaki, Y. Marinakis, “A Glowworm Swarm ‎Optimization algorithm for the Vehicle Routing Problem with ‎Stochastic Demands,” Expert Syst. Appl., 46: 145–163, ‎2016.

[23] Y. Yoon, Y.-H. Kim, “An Efficient Genetic Algorithm for ‎Maximum Coverage Deployment in Wireless Sensor ‎Networks,” IEEE Trans. Cybern., 43(5): 1473–1483, ‎ 2013.

[24] L. Sun, X. Song, T. Chen, “An Improved Convergence ‎Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm with Random ‎Sampling of Control Parameters,” Journal of Control Science ‎and Engineering, 2019: 1-1-11, 2019.

[25] ‎“How to Calculate Euclidean Distance.”, 2020.

[26] S. Ashraf, S. Saleem, T. Ahmed, Z. Aslam, D. Muhammad, ‎‎“Conversion of adverse data corpus to shrewd output using ‎sampling metrics,” Vis. Comput. Ind. Biomed. Art, 3(19): 1-13, 2020.

[27] R. Storn, K. Price, “Differential Evolution – A Simple and ‎Efficient Heuristic for global Optimization over Continuous ‎Spaces,” J. Glob. Optim., 11(4): 341–359, 1997.

[28] S. Balsamo, A. Marin, E. Vicario, Eds., New Frontiers in ‎Quantitative Methods in Informatics: 7th Workshop, InfQ ‎‎2017, Venice, Italy, December 4, 2017, Revised Selected ‎Papers, 1st ed. 2018 edition. New York, NY: Springer, 2018.‎

[29] S. Das, A. Biswas, S. Dasgupta, A. Abraham, “Bacterial ‎Foraging Optimization Algorithm: Theoretical Foundations, ‎Analysis, and Applications,” in Foundations of ‎Computational Intelligence Volume 3: Global Optimization, A. ‎Abraham, A.-E. Hassanien, P. Siarry, and A. Engelbrecht, Eds. ‎Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer: 23–55, 2009.

[30] M. Li, X. Du, X. Liu, C. Li, “Shortest Path Routing Protocol ‎Based on the Vertical Angle for Underwater Acoustic ‎Networks,” Journal of Sensors, 2019: 1-14, 2019. ‎

[31] R. Yongmao, L. Jun, S. Shanshan, L. Lingling, W. Guodong, Z. Beichuan, “Congestion ‎control in named data networking – A survey,” Comput. ‎Commun., 86: 1–11, 2016.

[32] S. Ashraf, D. Muhammad, M. Shuaeeb, Z. Aslam, ‎‎“Development of Shrewd Cosmetology Model Through Fuzzy ‎Logic,” J. Res. Eng. Appl. Sci., 5(3): 93–99, 2020.

[33] S. Ashraf, S. Saleem, T. Ahmed, “Sagacious Communication ‎Link Selection Mechanism for Underwater Wireless Sensors ‎Network,” Int. J. Wirel. Microw. Technol., 10(4): ‎‎22–33, 2020.

[34] S. Ashraf, M. Gao, Z. Chen, S. Kamran, Z. Raza, “Efficient ‎Node Monitoring Mechanism in WSN using Contikimac ‎Protocol,” Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl., 8(11): 429-437, 2017.

[35] S. Ashraf, M. Gao, Z. Chen, H. Naeem, A. Ahmad, T. Ahmed, ‎‎“Underwater Pragmatic Routing Approach Through Packet ‎Reverberation Mechanism,” IEEE Access, 8: 163091–‎‎163114, 2020.

[36] M. Safkhani, “Cryptanalysis of R2AP an Ultralightweight ‎Authentication Protocol for RFID,” J. Electr. Comput. Eng. ‎Innov., 6(1): 111-118, 2018.

[37] S. Shams Shamsabad Farahani, “Congestion Control ‎Approaches Applied to Wireless Sensor Networks: A Survey,” ‎J. Electr. Comput. Eng. Innov., 6(2): 129-149, 2018.

LETTERS TO EDITOR

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering Innovations (JECEI) welcomes letters to the editor for the post-publication discussions and corrections which allows debate post publication on its site, through the Letters to Editor. Letters pertaining to manuscript published in JECEI should be sent to the editorial office of JECEI within three months of either online publication or before printed publication, except for critiques of original research. Following points are to be considering before sending the letters (comments) to the editor.

[1] Letters that include statements of statistics, facts, research, or theories should include appropriate references, although more than three are discouraged.

[2] Letters that are personal attacks on an author rather than thoughtful criticism of the author’s ideas will not be considered for publication.

[3] Letters can be no more than 300 words in length.

[4] Letter writers should include a statement at the beginning of the letter stating that it is being submitted either for publication or not.

[5] Anonymous letters will not be considered.

[6] Letter writers must include their city and state of residence or work.

[7] Letters will be edited for clarity and length.

Name *

Email Address *

Affiliation *

Comments *

Security Code *

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering Innovations (JECEI)

Depuration‎ based Efficient Coverage Mechanism for ‎Wireless Sensor Network

References

References

Send comment about this article

Volume 8, Issue 2
July 2020
Pages 145-160

Depuration‎ based Efficient Coverage Mechanism for ‎Wireless Sensor Network

References

References

Send comment about this article

Volume 8, Issue 2July 2020Pages 145-160

Volume 8, Issue 2
July 2020
Pages 145-160