Document Type : Original Research Paper

Authors

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Kashan, Kashan, Iran.

Abstract

Background and Objectives: The purpose of a wireless body area network (WBAN) is to collect and send vital body signals to the physician to make timely decisions, improve the efficiency of medical informatics systems, and save costs. The sensors of the WBAN network have limited size and energy, and hence, to extend the lifetime of these sensors, they can be powered wirelessly. Our focus in this paper is on a two-tier full-duplex (FD) cooperative WBAN in which sensors, in addition to transmitting physiological information, harvest energy from radio frequency (RF) coordinator signals and body sources. Our goal is to maximize average weighted sum throughput (AWST) under the constraints of each sensor, including meeting the minimum data rate, delay limitation, energy and transmission power constraints.
Methods: The resources allocated to solve this optimization problem are the time slots, the transmission rates of the sensors and coordinator, and the transmission powers of sensors in each time slot. The time scheduling problem in the first step is modeled in the form of a mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) problem and the second step problem is convex. Also, Karush–Kuhn–Tucker (KKT) conditions are presented for power and rate allocation.
Results: In the optimal allocation (OA) mode, contrary to the equal time allocation (ETA) one, with increasing the relay power, the AWST increases despite increasing self-interference (SI). Energy harvesting from the body, nevertheless the power consumption for transmission, makes positive the slope of the instantaneous energy curve for the motion sensor and reduces the corresponding slope for the electrocardiogram (ECG) one. Comparison of the proposed method with previous methods shows that the proposed method has better control over the information flow of sensors, and also in allocating rate to users, fairness is satisfied.
Conclusion: According to the simulation results in our method, the system showed better performance than the equal time allocation mode. We also used the FD technique and with the help of the optimal time scheduling index, we were able to control the SI.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Open Access

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

 

Publisher’s Note

JECEI Publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

 

Publisher

Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University


LETTERS TO EDITOR

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering Innovations (JECEI) welcomes letters to the editor for the post-publication discussions and corrections which allows debate post publication on its site, through the Letters to Editor. Letters pertaining to manuscript published in JECEI should be sent to the editorial office of JECEI within three months of either online publication or before printed publication, except for critiques of original research. Following points are to be considering before sending the letters (comments) to the editor.


[1] Letters that include statements of statistics, facts, research, or theories should include appropriate references, although more than three are discouraged.

[2] Letters that are personal attacks on an author rather than thoughtful criticism of the author’s ideas will not be considered for publication.

[3] Letters can be no more than 300 words in length.

[4] Letter writers should include a statement at the beginning of the letter stating that it is being submitted either for publication or not.

[5] Anonymous letters will not be considered.

[6] Letter writers must include their city and state of residence or work.

[7] Letters will be edited for clarity and length.

CAPTCHA Image