Document Type : Original Research Paper
Authors
Department of Railway Engineering and Transportation Planning, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Model predictive control (MPC) is a practical and attractive control methodology for the control of power electronic converters and electrical motor drives. MPC has a simple structure and enables the simultaneous consideration of different objectives and constraints. However, when applying MPC for multilevel inverters (MLIs), especially at higher voltage levels, the number of switching states dramatically increases. This issue becomes more severe when MLIs are used to supply electrical motor drives.
Methods: This paper proposes three different MPC strategies that reduce the number of iterations and computation burden in a 3-phase 4-level flying capacitor inverter (FCI). Traditional MPC with a reduced number of switching conditions, split MPC, and hybrid MPC-PWM control are investigated in this work.
Results: In all methods, the capacitor voltages of the FCI are balanced during different operational conditions. The number of iterations is reduced from 512 in traditional MPC to at least 192 in the split MPC. Moreover, the split MPC strategy eliminates the usage and optimization of weighting factors for capacitors voltage balance. However, in the hybrid MPC-PWM control method in comparison to other methods, the voltage balancing time is much lower, the phase current tracks the reference more accurately, the transient time is lower, and the efficiency is higher. In addition, the capacitors voltage ripple is negligible in the hybrid MPC-PWM control method.
Conclusion: Simulation results manifest the effectiveness of the suggested hybrid MPC-PWM methodology. Results manifest that the hybrid MPC-PWM control offers perfect dynamic characteristics and succeeds in maintaining the voltage balance during different operational conditions.
Keywords
- Calculation burden
- Delay compensation
- Flying capacitor inverter
- Hybrid Method
- Model Predictive Control (MPC)
Main Subjects
Open Access
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Publisher’s Note
JECEI Publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Publisher
Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University
Send comment about this article