Document Type : Original Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Computer Engineering, Urmia Branch, Islamic Azad University, Urmia, Iran.

2 2Department of Computer Engineering, Shabestar Branch, Islamic Azad University Shabestar, Iran.

10.22061/jecei.2024.11230.779

Abstract

Background and Objectives: A network on Chip (NoC) is a scalable communication framework that supports several cores. In some cases, while designing a customized Network-on-Chip, the communication needs across IP cores are often uneven, resulting in imbalanced loads on the input ports of a router. The arbitration unit plays a crucial role in the design of the NoC micro-router architecture as it substantially influences the performance, chip occupancy, and power consumption of the NoC.
Methods: This article presents a router arbitration architecture that utilizes a mix of variable priority arbitration and round-robin methods. The arbitration process evaluates other channels' requests using the Round Robin index within this architectural framework. A novel approach was suggested to integrate a network router unit onto a single chip, offering several benefits compared to earlier methods. The most significant advantage is its variable priority feature, which allows inputs to be assigned different priority levels regardless of the design circuit. The system is meant to prioritize fairness across all requests by sequentially executing them. The second and primary benefit of the developed circuit is its ability to retain the previously assigned virtual channel ID. This feature preserves the provided virtual channel ID and reduces the time required to verify the requested virtual channels in the subsequent cycle.
Results: The evaluation process occurs after the flit has been requested to quit the virtual channel and the availability of the corresponding virtual channel has been verified. The simulation findings demonstrate that the RR-SFVP arbitration unit's design is 12.1% more compact in space than the standard RR approach, offering a promising solution for space-constrained designs. It exhibits 4.3% lower power consumption, a significant improvement in energy efficiency, and 55.1% reduced critical path time, enhancing the system's overall performance.
Conclusion: The RR-SFVP technique incorporates all favorable elements in the design of the arbitration unit circuit, such as variable priority and equitable arbitration. Its clear benefits make a strong case for its superiority in the field.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Open Access

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

 

Publisher’s Note

JECEI Publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

 

Publisher

Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University


LETTERS TO EDITOR

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering Innovations (JECEI) welcomes letters to the editor for the post-publication discussions and corrections which allows debate post publication on its site, through the Letters to Editor. Letters pertaining to manuscript published in JECEI should be sent to the editorial office of JECEI within three months of either online publication or before printed publication, except for critiques of original research. Following points are to be considering before sending the letters (comments) to the editor.


[1] Letters that include statements of statistics, facts, research, or theories should include appropriate references, although more than three are discouraged.

[2] Letters that are personal attacks on an author rather than thoughtful criticism of the author’s ideas will not be considered for publication.

[3] Letters can be no more than 300 words in length.

[4] Letter writers should include a statement at the beginning of the letter stating that it is being submitted either for publication or not.

[5] Anonymous letters will not be considered.

[6] Letter writers must include their city and state of residence or work.

[7] Letters will be edited for clarity and length.

CAPTCHA Image