Document Type : Original Research Paper

Authors

Department of Geomatics Engineering, Faculty of Civil, Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University, Tehran, Iran.

10.22061/jecei.2026.12695.903

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Accurate soil moisture estimation is essential for various hydrological processes such as irrigation planning, and environmental monitoring; however, prediction accuracy is often limited by sparse in-situ measurements and uncertainties in remote sensing products. This study aims to develop an enhanced soil moisture prediction framework by integrating a Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) deep learning model with multi source data augmentation techniques in order to evaluate its performance across diverse climatic conditions.
Methods: This study proposed an enhanced GRU deep learning framework supported by multi source data augmentation to predict soil moisture across ten U.S. Climate Reference Network (USCRN) stations representing diverse climatic and ecological conditions. The proposed model integrates Conv1D layers, bidirectional GRUs, multi-head attention, and dense layers to capture short and long-term temporal dependencies while fusing multi source inputs including ISMN in-situ measurements, SMAP products, and GLDAS. Data augmentation strategies composed of noise injection, temporal warping, scaling, and window slicing were applied to expand the training dataset and reduce overfitting. Model performance was compared against a standard GRU using some of the evaluation metrics.
Results: Results demonstrate that the augmented GRU model consistently outperformed the standard GRU across all stations, with notable improvements in R² (up to 0.912), RMSE, and MAE. Performance gains were particularly evident in humid continental and Mediterranean climates, while regions with complex forested or semi-arid environments also benefited from data augmentation. These improvements confirm that data augmentation enhances the model’s generalization under climatic variability and mitigates limitations associated with SMAP resolution and GLDAS uncertainty.
Conclusion: The integration of multi-source datasets with an augmented GRU architecture provides a reliable framework for soil moisture estimation across diverse environments. The proposed approach offers strong potential for applications in environmental monitoring, precision agriculture, and water resource management.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Open Access

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

 

Publisher’s Note

JECEI Publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

 

Publisher

Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University


LETTERS TO EDITOR

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering Innovations (JECEI) welcomes letters to the editor for the post-publication discussions and corrections which allows debate post publication on its site, through the Letters to Editor. Letters pertaining to manuscript published in JECEI should be sent to the editorial office of JECEI within three months of either online publication or before printed publication, except for critiques of original research. Following points are to be considering before sending the letters (comments) to the editor.


[1] Letters that include statements of statistics, facts, research, or theories should include appropriate references, although more than three are discouraged.

[2] Letters that are personal attacks on an author rather than thoughtful criticism of the author’s ideas will not be considered for publication.

[3] Letters can be no more than 300 words in length.

[4] Letter writers should include a statement at the beginning of the letter stating that it is being submitted either for publication or not.

[5] Anonymous letters will not be considered.

[6] Letter writers must include their city and state of residence or work.

[7] Letters will be edited for clarity and length.

CAPTCHA Image