Document Type : Original Research Paper

Authors

Computer Engineering Department, Faculty of Technology and Engineering, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran.

10.22061/jecei.2026.12463.883

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Brain tumor detection in MRI images is critical for early diagnosis and effective treatment, yet manual interpretation is time-consuming and prone to variability. Deep learning models such as YOLO have advanced real-time object detection, but their speed–accuracy tradeoff remains a challenge for medical tasks involving small or low-contrast lesions. The potential of transformer-based detectors like RT-DETR to simultaneously improve accuracy and maintain real-time speed in clinical settings is not well established.
Methods: This study performed a controlled head-to-head comparison between the proposed model (RT-DETR-L-based model) and the YOLOv8s models using a curated, single-class brain tumor MRI dataset of 300 images. Both models were trained and evaluated under identical conditions with comprehensive data augmentation strategies, and their performance was assessed using standard object detection metrics including precision, recall, specificity, and mean Average Precision (mAP) across multiple IoU thresholds.
Results: The proposed model achieved higher localization fidelity and overall accuracy compared to YOLOv8s, with mAP@0.5:0.95 of 0.493 versus 0.421 and mAP@0.5 of 0.963 versus 0.941. Precision and specificity for the proposed model reached 1.000, eliminating false positives, while recall was slightly lower than YOLOv8s (0.925 vs. 0.932), indicating a marginal increase in missed detections. Qualitative analysis confirmed robust detection across various tumor sizes and intensities, though some small or low-contrast lesions were missed.
Conclusion: Proposed model surpasses YOLOv8s in accuracy and specificity for real-time brain tumor detection in MRI images, offering a promising balance between speed and precision. However, its slightly lower recall underscores the need for further refinement to minimize false negatives. The findings suggest transformer-based detectors can narrow the speed–accuracy gap in medical imaging, but broader validation and optimization for resource-constrained environments are required for clinical deployment. Future work should focus on enhancing sensitivity and generalizability through advanced augmentation, larger datasets, and ensemble approaches.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Open Access

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

 

Publisher’s Note

JECEI Publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

 

Publisher

Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University


LETTERS TO EDITOR

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering Innovations (JECEI) welcomes letters to the editor for the post-publication discussions and corrections which allows debate post publication on its site, through the Letters to Editor. Letters pertaining to manuscript published in JECEI should be sent to the editorial office of JECEI within three months of either online publication or before printed publication, except for critiques of original research. Following points are to be considering before sending the letters (comments) to the editor.


[1] Letters that include statements of statistics, facts, research, or theories should include appropriate references, although more than three are discouraged.

[2] Letters that are personal attacks on an author rather than thoughtful criticism of the author’s ideas will not be considered for publication.

[3] Letters can be no more than 300 words in length.

[4] Letter writers should include a statement at the beginning of the letter stating that it is being submitted either for publication or not.

[5] Anonymous letters will not be considered.

[6] Letter writers must include their city and state of residence or work.

[7] Letters will be edited for clarity and length.

CAPTCHA Image