Document Type : Original Research Paper

Authors

1 Electronic Department, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Artificial Intelligence Department, Faculty of Computer Engineering, Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Background and Objectives: In the realm of compressed sensing, most greedy sparse recovery algorithms necessitate former information about the signal's sparsity level, which may not be available in practical conditions. To address this, methods based on the Sparsity Adaptive Matching Pursuit (SAMP) algorithm have been developed to self-determine this parameter and recover the signal using only the sampling matrix and measurements. Determining a suitable Initial Value for the algorithm can greatly affect the performance of the algorithm.
Methods: One of the latest sparsity adaptive methods is Correlation Calculation SAMP (CCSAMP), which relies on correlation calculations between the signals recovered from the support set and the candidate set. In this paper, we present a modified version of CCSAMP that incorporates a pre-estimation phase for determining the initial value of the sparsity level, as well as a modified acceptance criteria considering the variance of noise.
Results: To validate the efficiency of the proposed algorithm over the previous approaches, random sparse test signals with various sparsity levels were generated, sampled at the compression ratio of 50%, and recovered with the proposed and previous methos. The results indicate that the suggested method needs, on average, 5 to 6 fewer iterations compared to the previous methods, just due to the pre-estimation of the initial guess for the sparsity level. Furthermore, as far as the least square technique is integrated in some parts of the algorithm, in presence of noise the modified acceptance criteria significantly improve the success rate while achieving a lower mean squared error (MSE) in the recovery process.
Conclusion: The pre-estimation process makes it possible to recover signal with fewer iterations while keeping the recovery quality as before. The fewer the number of iterations, the faster the algorithm. By incorporating the noise variance into the accept criteria, the method achieves a higher success rate and a lower mean squared error (MSE) in the recovery process.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Open Access

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

 

Publisher’s Note

JECEI Publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

 

Publisher

Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University


LETTERS TO EDITOR

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering Innovations (JECEI) welcomes letters to the editor for the post-publication discussions and corrections which allows debate post publication on its site, through the Letters to Editor. Letters pertaining to manuscript published in JECEI should be sent to the editorial office of JECEI within three months of either online publication or before printed publication, except for critiques of original research. Following points are to be considering before sending the letters (comments) to the editor.


[1] Letters that include statements of statistics, facts, research, or theories should include appropriate references, although more than three are discouraged.

[2] Letters that are personal attacks on an author rather than thoughtful criticism of the author’s ideas will not be considered for publication.

[3] Letters can be no more than 300 words in length.

[4] Letter writers should include a statement at the beginning of the letter stating that it is being submitted either for publication or not.

[5] Anonymous letters will not be considered.

[6] Letter writers must include their city and state of residence or work.

[7] Letters will be edited for clarity and length.

CAPTCHA Image