H. Rashidi
Abstract
One of the modern paradigms to develop an application is object oriented analysis and design. In this paradigm, there are several objects and each object plays some specific roles in applications. In an application, we must distinguish between procedural semantics and declarative semantics for their ...
Read More
One of the modern paradigms to develop an application is object oriented analysis and design. In this paradigm, there are several objects and each object plays some specific roles in applications. In an application, we must distinguish between procedural semantics and declarative semantics for their implementation in a specific programming language. For the procedural semantics, we can write a set of instructions that must be executed sequentially. The declarative semantics declare a set of facts and rules. They do not specify the sequence of steps for doing the processing. In this paper, we present four taxonomies for the rules in object-oriented paradigm and discuss how the paradigm can be extended to support declarative semantic of applications. Then, the rules in the taxonomies are evaluated in four case studies. After that, an approach is recommended for finding and implementation of declarative semantics, based on some practical experience obtained from the evaluation.
H. Rashidi
Abstract
Analysis and design of object oriented is onemodern paradigms for developing a system. In this paradigm, there are several objects and each object plays some specific roles. Identifying objects (and classes) is one of the most important steps in the object-oriented paradigm. This paper makes a literature ...
Read More
Analysis and design of object oriented is onemodern paradigms for developing a system. In this paradigm, there are several objects and each object plays some specific roles. Identifying objects (and classes) is one of the most important steps in the object-oriented paradigm. This paper makes a literature review over techniques to identify objects and then presents six taxonomies for them. The first taxonomy is based on the documents exist for a domain. The second taxonomy is based on reusable previous knowledge and the third one relies on commonalities in a domain. The fourth taxonomy is concerned with decomposing a domain. The fifth taxonomy is based on experience view and sixth one is related to use the abstraction in a domain. In this paper, the constraints, strengths and weaknesses of the techniques in each taxonomy are described. Then, the techniques are evaluated in four systems inside an educational center in a university. A couple of approach is recommended for finding objects, based on some practical experiences obtained from the evaluation.
