Software
M. Sadeghzadeh Hemayati; H. Rashidi
Abstract
Background and Objectives: One of the major challenges in software engineering is how to respond to the desolate state of high-quality software development in a timely and cost-effective manner. Many studies have been conducted in an attempt to formalize the quality of software. However, according to ...
Read More
Background and Objectives: One of the major challenges in software engineering is how to respond to the desolate state of high-quality software development in a timely and cost-effective manner. Many studies have been conducted in an attempt to formalize the quality of software. However, according to the recent researches, the lack of comprehensive quality model is rooted in neglecting all quality aspects. Methods: In this study, we review nineteen quality models and classify them from three different perspectives, including structural, behavioral, and basic and derived aspects. The main aim is to specify and extract the more comprehensive set of quality factors to evaluate software quality. Results: This paper compares the different quality models and analyzes the factors to draw the necessary aspects in comprehensive quality models. Since the software quality involves several engineering tasks and several players who deal with quality concepts during software life cycle according to their various roles, in various phases and different artifacts, comprehensive quality models must consider many factors. Conclusion: These factors are in different aspects such as the measurement time in different development phases, product as well as process-related quality factors, a set of quality metrics measureable on the different type of artifacts such as document, model and source code, and finally a specific mechanism to apply dynamic weights to quality factors to determine their impacts on final quality of a product based on its application domain. ======================================================================================================Copyrights©2018 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, as long as the original authors and source are cited. No permission is required from the authors or the publishers.======================================================================================================
H. Rashidi
Abstract
One of the modern paradigms to develop an application is object oriented analysis and design. In this paradigm, there are several objects and each object plays some specific roles in applications. In an application, we must distinguish between procedural semantics and declarative semantics for their ...
Read More
One of the modern paradigms to develop an application is object oriented analysis and design. In this paradigm, there are several objects and each object plays some specific roles in applications. In an application, we must distinguish between procedural semantics and declarative semantics for their implementation in a specific programming language. For the procedural semantics, we can write a set of instructions that must be executed sequentially. The declarative semantics declare a set of facts and rules. They do not specify the sequence of steps for doing the processing. In this paper, we present four taxonomies for the rules in object-oriented paradigm and discuss how the paradigm can be extended to support declarative semantic of applications. Then, the rules in the taxonomies are evaluated in four case studies. After that, an approach is recommended for finding and implementation of declarative semantics, based on some practical experience obtained from the evaluation.
H. Rashidi
Abstract
Analysis and design of object oriented is onemodern paradigms for developing a system. In this paradigm, there are several objects and each object plays some specific roles. Identifying objects (and classes) is one of the most important steps in the object-oriented paradigm. This paper makes a literature ...
Read More
Analysis and design of object oriented is onemodern paradigms for developing a system. In this paradigm, there are several objects and each object plays some specific roles. Identifying objects (and classes) is one of the most important steps in the object-oriented paradigm. This paper makes a literature review over techniques to identify objects and then presents six taxonomies for them. The first taxonomy is based on the documents exist for a domain. The second taxonomy is based on reusable previous knowledge and the third one relies on commonalities in a domain. The fourth taxonomy is concerned with decomposing a domain. The fifth taxonomy is based on experience view and sixth one is related to use the abstraction in a domain. In this paper, the constraints, strengths and weaknesses of the techniques in each taxonomy are described. Then, the techniques are evaluated in four systems inside an educational center in a university. A couple of approach is recommended for finding objects, based on some practical experiences obtained from the evaluation.
